<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Originals - May 2012 (Part 2)</title>
		<description>Discuss Originals - May 2012 (Part 2)</description>
		<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/107/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Diyan Kostadinov says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No Paul, the idea of n.13 was never presented before! In all six examples in my article which you noted above the main concept is single wP Excelsiors and Q promotions + Albino or model mates or corner mates. But in my problem n.13 the main goal here is not Excelsiors, but the original twin mechanism with +2 moves in each twin (which was the theme of the BCPS Tourney and this is a task realisation) enriched with rotations of the diagram and play in all directions which was incredibly difficult. Together with the four wQ promotions and model mates as a connection, the thematic content of the problem is shown here for the first time. So the reason that the problem were not awarded can not be about its originality and still wondering and hurt me, but it doesn't matter, the life go on and the problem is participating in this tourney now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Diyan Kostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>paul says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[About N#13: For more Q promotions in a h#, see the excellent article by Diyan http://kobulchess.com/en/articles/9-2011-08-02-06-15-19/43-short-articles-part-1.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>paul says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The idea of N#13 was realized with a white Pawn four times in the same problem, so four Excelsiors (by Diyan himself?) Maybe this is the reason that the problem N#13 was not classified at BCPS Olympic Tourney.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-455</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-173</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, n.19 is one more masterpiece from S.K.Balasubramanian - great fairy play and clear miniature aristocrat position! It's very good that both Kings are transformed and have an active role in solution.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-173</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>seetharaman says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[N.19 is a great idea. I think will be quoted widely as advertisement for Kobul Kings! I like the fact the Royal knight moves from the side to the open board to get mated !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>seetharaman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>seetharaman says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-144</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It does look a little schematic. Still I am surprised at its omission in the award. The award is available here: http://www.theproblemist.org/bcps-2012-tourney]]></description>
			<dc:creator>seetharaman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-144</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-142</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you Ram. Actually this my helpmate (n.13) was participated into the BCPS Olympic Tourney, but it was not included into the award... I was very disappointed, because I was sure that this is task for realisation of the tourney theme, with interesting twin form and thematic connection between the solutions, but probably my opinion was not right, because the problem was not awarded even with commendation...Probably such a task problems looks somehow schematic... I still do not saw the results from the tourney. Do you saw it somewhere?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-142</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>seetharaman says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Your helpmate fourfold (N.13) would have won the top prize in the Problemist tourney (the awards are out now). Obviously it was too difficult to finish within the due date.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>seetharaman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Both versions are good, but yes - without pawns the position is perfect clear and miniature. Well done!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>S. K.Balasubramanian says:</title>
			<link>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In my problem 19, I forgot to mention that brSh3 was suggested by my friend Mr. K. Seetharaman. Initially I used the following setting with the following solutions: Wh: Ka7 Pb4 Ph3 RLe1 BLh8 Bl: Kh4 Pf4 Pg5 RLe3 BLg7 H#2 (2 Sol) KoBul Kings on a7 & h4 Sol: 1.f3 RLxe3-e4[brK=rRL] 2.rRLxe4-d4[wrK=rRL] rRLxg7-h7[brRL=rBL] (BLxg7-f6?) 1.g4 BLxg7-f6[brK=rBL] 2.rBLxf6-e7[wrK=rBL] rBLxe3-f2 [brBL=rRL] (RLxe3-e4?) # I thank Mr.Seetharaman for his fine suggestion.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>S. K.Balasubramanian</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.kobulchesscom.escapehoudini.bg/en/problems/originals2012/107-originals-may-2012.html#comment-110</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
